Archive

Archive for the ‘Comic relief’ Category

“I’m looking for a princess” and other online dating profile gems

February 18, 2012 5 comments

These have been some of the biggest turn-offs for me when reading people’s online dating profiles:

  1. I am very good looking. (If you put a picture, let me decide for myself. If you didn’t, I’m feeling a tad suspicious.)
  2. I am funny but also serious. (Are you also tall but short?)
  3. I love going out but I also love staying in. (Opposites remind me of Sesame Street! I love Sesame Street. I also hate it. No I don’t.)
  4. I’m done playing games. (I’ve never played games… Could you explain what games you’ve played exactly?)
  5. I’m not like all the other idiots out there. (I think you just disproved that.)
  6. I’m not writing anything about myself here. Words are overrated. This site sucks… And the rest you’ll have to find out when we meet! (“When”?!)
  7. I am so impressive and wonderful. I’m also extremely modest. (Will you marry me?)
  8. She should be beautiful… (And your very subjective opinion of beauty entails… what exactly? No, I don’t really want to know.)
  9. She should be beautiful… On the inside and out. (Uh huh…)
  10. I’m looking for a princess. (*barf*)
  11. You’ve never met anyone like me. (Was that you helping me count my blessings?)

What would be in your list?

“Love means never having to say you’re sorry.”

January 27, 2011 14 comments

Love Story

Sniff sniff. Such a touching part of the movie, Love Story… Here it is:

Oh, you done? OK, I should stop gagging then and continue writing.

I so don’t agree with that barfy, Hollywoody line. Ah, you couldn’t tell?

Knowing how to say you’re sorry and being able to actually do it – get those words out when often it can feel so difficult to do so – is one of the bases of a healthy, happy relationship.

Fine, if I’m willing to even consider the idea for a moment, where would it come from? Is there any possibility it’s from someone who’s been in a healthy relationship? Maybe it’s from someone who has spent many years imagining the perfect relationship. And in that perfect relationship, because both people love each other so much, they are literally unable to hurt each other.

Isn’t that beautiful?

Well, that’s a relief!

OK, I’m convinced. :) From now on I’m looking for that relationship where I’ll never have to say sorry again. Amazing that all my flaws are going to dissipate into thin air. And apparently with little to know effort, too!

I’m looking forward!

Three most important words in marriage

Now, in case you aren’t totally convinced, and you want to hear a different opinion, you should check out this article on aish.com about the three most important words in a marriage. Can you guess which words they are?

Rabbi Yaakov Solomon writes in this article that he heard a lecturer say:

“What are the three most important words in a marriage?”

“Easy,” I thought. ” I love you.”

“And they are not, ‘I love you,” he added.

The audience stirred. Hair-twirling was suspended. Even some lint pickers took notice. I could hear everybody’s mind working. “What could be more important than I love you? What phrase could he possibly be talking about?”

My mind raced with others’. Surely I could come up with a few possibilities of my own. How about:

“You getting that?” “You’re really tired?” “I was shaving.”

Thankfully, he put us out of our collective anticipatory misery relatively quickly. “The three most important words in a marriage are, “I was wrong.”

A lot of heads nodded. Count mine among them. A chord had been struck.

At least he didn’t say, “I am sorry.”

K, I’m finished with my sarcasm. :)

FFT.

He blogged about me!

December 2, 2010 Leave a comment

I just finished dating a guy who, it turned out, blogged about me while we were dating.

I found out because I saw incoming clicks to habitza from that link and though I wasn’t able to see the post (you need to be signed in), I was able to see his name. When I asked him about it, he sent me the text so I could read it. Nothing bad. Nothing too personal. It’s just a sort of play by play about our dating (went here, did that, etc.).

I can’t say I’m upset about this since a) I blog and b) he didn’t write anything bad there. Mostly I just find it fascinating to suddenly be on the receiving end of a blog. :)

And that’s all I have to say about that.

Postscript: The guy who blogged about me just told me that he took that post down. He decided it was too personal. Pretty sensitive especially since he was blogging about a blogger so he easily could have justified it to himself. Thank you, mystery man!

Categories: Comic relief

A sci-fi moment

November 21, 2010 3 comments

One of my wonderful readers, Shai, wrote a very thought-provoking comment on my blog post about online dating which generated, for me, a scene that could be in a science fiction movie.

The population of men are standing facing the population of women. They each have the criteria of what they are looking for in a partner and they shoot their criteria at each other. Only when their criteria match each other (like, she’s a 38 year old woman looking for a 35-49 year old man and he’s a 45 year old man looking for a 30-40 year old woman) do the criteria hit each other and explode in the air, which is a sign of a matching criteria.

The problem is, of course, that 99.9% of the time, there are no explosions. All the criteria are just shooting aimlessly past each other, continuing off into eternity.

:)

Photos by Marcin Wichary on flickr here and here.

Matchmaker, hold your tongue.

November 14, 2010 Leave a comment

Professional sea-splitter

If matchmaking is difficult for the Great Creator, how difficult must it be for us measly humans. And yet some brave souls take on the task of making matches.

That being said… There should probably be a way for matchmakers to track their success and according to the results, decide if they should continue in that field or find something (probably with less human emotion on the line) to do.

Please understand, I don’t only mean success regarding percentages of matches made. I also mean as far as the general sensitivity towards the clients and the shadchan’s ability not to scar them.

A truly adorable story

Someone just told me that when a guy didn’t want to go out with her again, their matchmaker was sure to tell her that it was because he wasn’t attracted to her. She felt it was important the girl know that it was “only” that and nothing else.

Thanks, dear Matchmaker. I feel so much better now. Phew!


That is one thing you don’t say.

Or did you not read the manual? No reason to give anyone negative feedback they can’t do anything productive with. And, we feel down on ourselves enough as it is. No reason to remind us that we’re meeting total strangers who also don’t find us attractive.

I know that the shadchanit supposedly had good intentions but good intentions get you only so far. If you don’t know the basic rule:

There is almost never a reason, ever, to tell someone that they weren’t attractive to their date,

then that is a pretty big red light, if you ask me.

Give the matchmaker a chance.

Of course matchmakers are people too and they deserve to be given more than one little chance. If said matchmaker is usually sensitive and does not normally emotionally scar her clients or, maybe even better, if the matchmaker is open to hearing feedback, takes it seriously, and tries to improve, then I wouldn’t make too big a deal out of it. But if it were to turn out that she is insensitive more than a couple of times, I say dump the matchmaker and express your opinion she find a less dangerous job.

Men must be funny.

November 6, 2010 3 comments

This is an idea that seems to be very widely believed. Men must be funny to be a good partner. Today it is considered one of the traits that prove masculinity of a man (if so, does that mean that only butch women can be funny?). Reading guy’s profiles on dating websites is a pretty major example of people having this belief.

Why? Well, the majority of guys, when describing themselves (an exercise that many people find torturous to begin with), say that they are funny (as in, they’ll literally write – “I am a funny guy”). And a pretty large percentage of them try to prove this by being amusing and witty throughout their profiles. I imagine them praying that it’ll bring a smile, at the least, and an LMAO at the most, to the female readers’ lips.

Is Minty Dave funny?

 

***Kitch alert***

Seriously (haha), it’s just not statistically possible. Not all those guys can be funny. (Like in Fiddler on the Roof: “You’re right, and you’re right.” “They can’t both be right!” “You’re right too! Good Shabbos!”)

The fact is, of course, that you cannot be any funnier than you actually are. And as far fetched as it is, what I’m about to say, and as much as it sometimes feels like most people aren’t into this, being yourself is what you need to be. If you are funny, great. But if you aren’t, then trying to be funny is way more annoying than if you were to just be yourself.

You might lose the girl either way but hey, at least the second way leaves you some extra self respect. :)

P.S. Or actually, would the first way leave you with more self respect (cause you can always tell yourself that she didn’t like you because you weren’t being myself).

Photo by Neal. on flickr.

Breaking news: Rabbis are urging singles to sign pre-date agreements.

October 12, 2010 17 comments

 

If you can't commit to these points, you most probably will have to stop dating.

 

Damn. I’m such a bad liar. OK fine, I wish that “rabbis” had decided that they will now push the pre-date agreement. Here is my dream article, as if this were true:

Finally, leaders of the Jewish community have decided they must take a stand against all the lack of derech eretz happening within the dating world. They have begun drafting a pre-date agreement which is inspired by the pre-nup agreement being signed by couples before they get married. This new and innovative document helps people be more clear of how things will run during and if necessary, when ending, their mutual dating experience.

One rabbi, who currently requested to remain anonymous, contacted HaBitza.com. He explained that the committee would like to make sure that all the most important points will appear on the document. He thought that HaBitza might be the perfect platform where this discussion could take place.

I have decided to start the discussion by supplying a few points I feel are important to agree upon before beginning to date someone. In the comments below please let us know what else you think should be in the “pre-date.”

  1. Both sides agree to be appreciative and show it, too. This means, for example, that they will thank each other when one does something for the other and both will thank each other at the end of the date for giving of their time and energies.
  2. Both sides agree to do their best to express what they want to say in clear sentences, not expecting the other side to read their minds.
  3. The man must be in touch with the woman within two days of the date, unless he was extremely seriously wounded while saving a baby in some majorly heroic act. (And, by the way, in the case of the heroism, the girl must fall for the guy whether or not she enjoyed his company on the dates.) This applies whether there is interest in another date or not. If the man really does not have it in him to reject gracefully on the phone, he is allowed, and encouraged, to send a text message so that it is clear to the woman that there will not be another date.
  4. If there is a misunderstanding, both sides may seek advice from third parties but then the misunderstandings will be spoken about between the two daters. There will be an attempt made on both sides that even if the relationship does not continue, hard feelings are worked through earlier rather than later so that both sides can move on feeling OK about what happened.
  5. If one person needs it, he/she agrees to go to therapy so they don’t, often unknowingly, take out their whole past on their fellow dater. Also, when necessary, the persons needing mesch classes agree to go until the mensch expert believes that from now on the person will be able to hold themselves back from hurting their dates knowingly and unknowingly.

Honestly, I do wish I could agree on certain things with a guy before I even went on a date with him. I am inspired to change the world and make this happen. Maybe matchmakers could discuss these things with people and then only set them up if they are fairly confident the person could uphold their side of the deal. And then, if they ever don’t, and don’t have a good excuse for it (or don’t have a sincere want to work on themselves), the matchmaker would stop setting them up.

What do you think? Make sure to share in the comments what you think should be in this new pre-date agreement!

Photo by lrargerich on flickr.

How you say “Sexist pig?”

October 5, 2010 3 comments

Benji Lovitt asked advice on women from his cab driver. Probably the most amusing part is getting to actually “hear” what Benji is thinking in captions during the conversation.

Categories: Comic relief, Video

I think YOU need a little Bob Marley!

October 3, 2010 1 comment

Don’t worry. ’bout a thing.

Categories: Comic relief, Video

Michael Makovi’s lesson on women

September 29, 2010 8 comments

Michael Makovi has generously agreed to share the true story about the two week period when he learned a lot about women.

Michael. Check out his blog by clicking on his pic.

Back in April / Nisan of 2008, I happened to meet a young woman on Facebook, whom I could tell had a damn good head on her shoulders. (She was communicating on a group I belonged to, about Maimonidean rationalism, discussing proofs that the Zohar is not an authentic part of the Jewish tradition.) I said that we should “meet up”, and we scheduled a meeting. Read that very carefully: I said we should ”meet”; I would pay the price for my ambiguity later.I used the word ”meeting” very deliberately. Suffice it to say for now, it was not a smart move by me. So we had our first “meeting”, and then, a few days later, we went on a date (*a* date, not *another* date). That night, I got to walk her quite a ways home, even though she kept telling me that she didn’t need an escort.

Over the next few days, meanwhile, we were having very long phone conversations, sometimes for three or so hours at a time. Sometimes, we were both getting up out of bed too late for class, because we kept talking to each other first thing in the morning. (I remember the highlight of my day being waking up, to see if any messages from her had come while I had been sleeping.) I actually still have saved all the text messages we sent to each other; I count ninety messages from her. So it was a rather intense relationship, I suppose. In fact, on our first meeting, which lasted several meetings, we made plans to meet again that same night! The plan fell through, because she got sick, but still, when you plan two meetings with the same person on the same day, you know something promising is afoot.

Meanwhile, for some reason that I no longer remember – probably because the “reason” was too stupid even for a sea-sponge – I got the idea in my head that perhaps, she wasn’t romantically interested in me. But of course, I didn’t want to sound like an idiot (which I think I was), so I didn’t actually ask her. Because that would be too obvious, of course.

So she called me one day and asks me if I’d like to meet up with her, right then, at that moment. I went to the appointed spot, and she had several friends with her. We proceeded to spend the next hour or two going clothes-shopping.

(Most.boring.time in my life. Look, this girl could have been a scantily-clad supermodel, and it’d still have been boring enough to drive a man near to suicide. I highly recommend to all the women here that you *never* take a man to a clothing store. *Ever*. If you have to, drop him off somewhere en route, and pick him up later. For the love of G-d, please, *never* take a man to a clothing store. And for some reason, my friend Neti also took me clothing shopping, but in her defense, I was in fact making romantic advances towards her that she was repeatedly declining, so she has an excuse. If you want to tell a guy you aren’t interested in him, just take him shopping for clothing.)

So, I had already had thoughts that she wasn’t interested in me romantically, and the fact that she took me with her girlfriends to a clothing store only cemented this thought in my mind. I thought maybe she was trying to subtly distance me from romantic-type thoughts so as to spare my feelings. I consulted with a female friend of mine, and she confirmed my suspicions.

Then, in my inexperienced, insensitive way, I *called* her – on the *phone* – to apologize to her if my repeated flirting and such had made her uncomfortable, and had made her feel the need to try to distance herself from me, etc. Of course, in doing this, I had unilaterally assumed how she must be feeling, without ever asking her (cf. http://habitza.com/2010/09/23/does-he-want-a-second-date/). Well, wouldn’t you know it, but she up and burst
into tears on the spot! In between her sobs, we had a conversation something like the following:

Her: WHAT DO YOU THINK WE’VE BEEN DOING THIS WHOLE TIME?
Me: Err…I don’t know…?
Her: The second time we were out, wasn’t that a date?
Me: Oh, the *second* was a date? Then what was the *first* time we met?
Her: You asked me if we wanted to “MEET UP”!!!! Ergo, it wasn’t a
date! But wasn’t the *second* time a date? And if not, why did you
walk me home the whole way?
Me: Err…oh…crud…

I then explained to her how I thought she wasn’t romantically interested, and was (to my sea-sponge-esque intelligence) trying to distance me, and such, and she asked me why I didn’t simply ask her. I told her that I didn’t want to sound stupid.

Meanwhile, for the past several times we had had conversations, she often accused me of not listening to her. She would tell me about her problems, such as her not knowing how to balance her desire to stay in Israel with her desire to finish her degree in America. Then, I would give her practical advice on how to solve that problem. Repeatedly, she’d say I wasn’t listening to her, and I’d respond that given my point-by-point practical advice, I was most definitely listening to her every word! But our conversations on this topic always ended at an impasse, with no satisfactory conclusion. We had several such conversations.

So a few days after the conversation of her sobs and my cluelessness, she called me and said we had to meet up again. She told me how much she liked me, etc. etc., but that too many times, I had failed to listen to her. Furthermore, the sob-conversation didn’t help. She told me that I reminded her too much of her father, who loved her but was too emotionally-dense to ever tell her that fact during her entire childhood. Plus, she had to return to America to finish her degree. On top of that, my lack of college degree or livelihood-earning-capability didn’t help either. She told me that she’d return to America, and that we should both date other people in the meantime, but that if and when she returned, we could resume dating. So that was that. I saw her one last time, when I saw her off to her bus en route to the airport.

Oh, and even after she left Israel, we were still communicating, and I managed to offend her yet again, when she was telling me more about her problems, and I yet again offered her practical advice. So then, with a rabbi with whom I had a havruta in learning Orhot Tzadiqim – this rabbi doubling as a marriage counselor – I discussed my supposed inability to “listen” to this girl. He told me that when women tell you their problems, they want emotional commiseration, *not* practical solutions to their problems. Finally, I understood why she thought I wasn’t “listening” to her, and finally, I understood why my defense (how could I offer point-by-point practical advice to her unless I very carefully listened to her) did not assuage her. Following this conversation, my rabbi would occasionally make a funny impression of me being an emotionless hyper-Yekke. (This rabbi learned under Rabbi Dr. Eliezer Berkovits – FTW!!!! (What’s FTW?) Also, I *totally* want him to be my chatan teacher when the appropriate day comes, but I digress…) So I asked the girl (by now in America) what would have happened had I followed this rabbi’s advice to give her emotional commiseration and not practical advice, and she straight-up told me, “We’d still be dating.”

And that was the end of that. Six months after she left Israel, she was engaged. Oh, and our entire relationship in Israel, with all its bumps, lasted one-and-a-half *weeks*. Yes, less than two weeks!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers