Blame it on the guys?
When there’s a problem, our natural instinct (or is it a cultural thing?) is to try to find the culprit, or, “The Root of the Problem.”
So I just read an article by Dennis Prager where he asks the question: Is America Still Making Men?
Of course (knowing Prager) his answer is “No,” and he goes into great detail explaining all the reasons he believes that in the past, boys were expected to become men and now boys continue to be boys.
I think I agree with that but there is only one reason I really agree with. The fourth reason he gives is:
America has become a rights-centered rather than a responsibility-centered society. Aside from helping to produce a pandemic of narcissism, the rights-centered mindset is the opposite of the obligation/responsibility-centered mindset that makes a boy into a man. It is not good for either sex to be rights-preoccupied; but it is particularly devastating to developing men, as men are supposed to be obligation-directed. The baby boomer generation helped destroy manhood in most of the ways described here. One additional example was its widespread slogan, “Make love, not war.” One cannot come up with a more unmanly piece of advice: “Don’t fight for your country, screw girls.” If the greatest generation had adopted that motto, Hitler and Tojo would have won. A few years ago, the city of Chicago named a street after Hugh Hefner, a man who has played games much of the day and night, lived in pajamas and devoted his life to sex — quite a model of manhood for American boys.
I think that for some reason our admiration has changed. It used to be (and it still is like this in more traditional cultures) that the older the person, the more respected they were. Today, it’s practically the opposite, with the young adult years being idealized and child-like behavior being respected. I have noticed that sometimes people will talk like a child (in terms of mannerisms, voice and conversation style) and this has become considered at least partially accepted and practically respected, as if the more child-like attitudes (which are theoretically carefree, happy, self-fulfilling and self-confident) are the better ones.
Because of these new ideals people are more self-centered and less mature. Maybe people are so focused on self-everything (fulfillment, happiness, gratification, satisfaction) that they never move beyond that to caring more about others (friends, family, needy, weaker parts of the community like elderly people). We’re so busy making sure we’re getting what we want that we can’t focus enough on others. And, of course, we end up not getting what we really need (a committed, loving relationship).
But I don’t see any of this as a problem belonging only to guys. What, only guys know how to be self-centered and self-absorbed? Only men are looking for self-fulfillment first and foremost? All women are altruistic, just waiting for the next opportunity to give to a fellow human being? Thank God I’m a woman so I can say without a doubt that I know from first hand experience that I am very capable of being very self-centered.
So, all that being said, is the singles problem more the fault of the guys than the girls? I mean, I can understand how maybe with how things work today, a guy just doesn’t feel that pull (or push) to focus on one girl. Maybe guys suffer from the selfish syndrome more than girls. But I find it hard to believe. Besides in cases of abuse, when a problem exists it’s usually everyone’s problem on some level.
In a very respectful way, I’d be curious to hear where you see room for improvement in the actions of men and/or women. And I’m also wondering, do you even think anyone is exactly to blame at all?
Photo by roland on flickr.





