Home > Dating philosophy, Favourites, The community > If only we were charedi

If only we were charedi

(Charedi, for those who don’t know, literally means fearful but the term refers to “ultra-Orthodox” Jews. You know, black clothes, black hat, people dressed more modestly and in general they are more stringent when it comes to keeping the Torah’s laws.)

Over Shabbat I was talking to my charedi brother in law (BIL). We were discussing dating, of course (when will people start getting sick of me bringing up this topic?), and I found that the way he spoke about dating in the more charedi world seemed so much more appealing to me, suddenly. I am not becoming charedi but I’m definitely willing to learn from them.

But before we see what he said, it’s important to realize that of course we won’t be able to directly implement what they do in our communities because the way they do things is based on how their communities are structured. So, for example, when it comes to dating, Mr. BIL was telling me how when he went out with a girl, he purposely didn’t talk about serious things like religion or topics connected to marriage. He just wanted to see if he enjoyed his time with the girl. They went out for around an hour the first time and then decided if they wanted to go out again a different time.

It’s genius, if you ask me. I have been very worried (admittedly, on a personal level as well as a communal one) about the focus that is given in the dati leumi/modern Orthodox/traditional communities to religion in dating. I feel like too much focus is put on things like sleeve length, head covering intentions, number of times of learning per week, “hashkafa,” etc. etc.

But there is a big difference between us and the charedi community. For the most part, they date within a relatively very small group, sticking to their specific chasidut. So on a date, you know how the girl dresses and her religious intentions, etc., before you even go out with her. In our community, since there is a pretty wide range of religious observance, you could theoretically be part of the same community but be quite different from each other as far as your observance.

That being said, I still think that letting go of having such a specific idea of how much your spouse is going to keep or not keep, might be one of the best things that ever happened to us. (Am I exaggerating?)

I spoke to some people about this over Shabbat, after my conversation with my BIL. I heard some very interesting comments. One guy and girl were both saying how over the years they’ve loosened up a lot about what they expect their spouse to be like religiously. They are open to a wider range of religious observances now. The guy said that anyhow, people are changing all the time and who says that if you marry someone exactly like you religiously, that in five years from now you’ll still match?

Later I spoke to another woman who said that she defines the characteristics that we’re looking for in a partner into two: the external ones, and core ones. When we’re younger we think that certain traits are core ones but once we get older we realize they aren’t. For example, we might think that specific religious observance or wanting to move to Israel are core. But, in fact, she was saying, this would mean the love is אהבה התלויה בדבר. That means, a love that is dependant on something, a thing. And, according to the source for that term, Pirkei Avot 5, mishna 20 (man, do I know how to google!), a love that is based on a “thing,” when the thing disappears, the love disappears.

heart

Aw!!!!!!

A very silly example would be if two people “loved” each other because they both are into the same music or books.

On the other hand, once we get older, maybe we start understanding better what is a core part of ourselves and what is more external. That goes along with what the guy and girl had said earlier in the day, that they were more open to a wider range of religiosities (I’m quite sure that isn’t a word). To me it didn’t sound like they’re forcing themselves to give up on something that is still very important to them. Sounds more like, even though they are still religious and serious about being religious, they have more perspective on what is important in a life partner.

It still is complicated, of course. Where do you draw the line? How much do you push yourself? What if you really are very uncomfortable with the idea of being with a girl who only wears skirts or a girl who sometimes wears pants? Is that a problem or is that just your personal comfort level? We definitely need to take a good look at our list of criteria and see where we can loosen up in order to allow our besherts into our lives but the question is, where do we draw the line?

All that being said, I was pleasantly surprised when I spoke to these people today. I thought people are being very rigid about who they’re willing to go out with religiously but, based on my extremely thorough scientific research this Shabbat (being facetious), maybe it’s not as bad as I thought. And maybe we really are all charedi afterall. : )

Photo by pasotrasposo at flickr.

Advertisement
  1. married Israeli
    November 15, 2009 at 7:20 pm | #1

    Precisely because the terms “mordern Orthodox” or “dati leumi” (Which Noah Roth will scream at you is NOT the same thing as MO) can mean such a wide range of ideas, I think it is important for dating couples to discuss these issues.

    Sure, my wife and I aren’t exactly the same as we were when we were dating; but our styles of approaching halacha, asking questions of rabbanim we trust and following their answer, has been an important staple in our lives.

    It would be disastrous, for example, to have a “daat torah” person marry a non “daat torah” person. Unless one of them totally changed, they would never have harmony in halachic decisions.

    • November 15, 2009 at 7:25 pm | #2

      OK, I totally hear what you’re saying but where do you draw the line? Wouldn’t there be something good about, at least for the first date or so, just to meet and sort of hang out to see if you enjoy each other’s company? Also, maybe something as important as: Do you go to a rabbi to ask questions? is important to discuss but maybe we get too into the details. Bekitzur, I can see how a daat Torah should marry a daat Torah but what else is important to establish in the beginning of dating and what is getting too much focus when it really isn’t that important?

      • Vera Resnick
        November 15, 2009 at 8:52 pm | #3

        maybe everyone should take their rabbis on dates…:)

  2. married Israeli
    November 15, 2009 at 7:51 pm | #4

    In the Charedi world, all matters of hashkafa are hashed out before the guy and girl ever meet.

    In the American yeshivish world, these things are sorted out sometimes by the matchmakers, sometimes by the daters themselves on the first date.

    The idea is – why get attached (or even start to fall in love) with someone that isn’t compatible?

    An extreme example, but worth telling over – a friend of mine is both a BT and a Cohen (how did he pull that off?)

    He got very emotionally involved more than once before the girl bothered to ask or find out….and then she said “oops – sorry”

    Yes, I know, not exactly the same thing. Still in all, if Saturday night for you is spent in “town” , and for him is spent at home or in a beit midrash… …it CAN work…. but it will usually crash and burn.

    Guys (generally speaking) brush it off and move on. It’s you lovely ladies I’m worried about. All of the crying, self-doubting, and marathon ice cream eating should be kept to a bare minimum.

    Why lead a girl towards that sad end when it could have been avoided with some prying on the first date, or earlier?

    • Vera Resnick
      November 15, 2009 at 8:46 pm | #5

      First of all, marathon ice cream eating is mandatory as part of any relationship – it’s the best excuse a girl has, sometimes the only one.
      Secondly – your Cohen friend, BT or not, should be broadcasting his cohannicness (sorry, I enjoy inventing words) to all dates – not waiting for the girl to ask or find out. Hopefully he now realises that it’s an important piece of information that should be public – not just in shul.
      Apart from all that – I agree with you and then some. There’s a lot more information that should be made available to both partners before the first phone call, let alone the first date. IMHO. Matchmakers are also involved in the Unteryeshivish Welt (a.k.a. “less frum than thou”), and they should take their activities within dati leumi/MO etc. world as seriously as they would in the yeshivish – even if there is no phalanx of rabbis to invoke cherem on them.

  3. Judith
    November 17, 2009 at 11:37 pm | #6

    Off-topic, Married men should also wear a ring. Broadcasting one’s cohannicness, agreed is imperative – how about marriedness? Don’t tell me gals you’ve never ever got into some major crush with Mr. Dreams of my life, only to find out the guy was off-limits.

    • November 18, 2009 at 11:33 am | #7

      Good point, Judith. I agree. Vera does too. (She just told me so.: )

  4. Susan
    November 29, 2009 at 11:54 pm | #8

    I’m MO and I never discuss religion and marriage in early dates. First dates, especially, are all about books and movies and television. Why so serious, Deena?

    • November 30, 2009 at 10:12 pm | #9

      Serious? Ma ze serious? :)

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers